Wide screen devices may view this page better by clicking here

7 May 2011

Facebook   Twitter

Join the Socialist Party Join us today!

Printable version Printable version

Facebook   Twitter

TUSC logo

TUSC local election results

Total number of candidates: 143
Updated results 7/5/2011 21:41pm

The Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition stood 143 candidates in the 5 May 2011 UK local elections. In addition there were 18 Socialist Alternative candidates in Coventry and eight Democratic Labour Party candidates in Walsall who have endorsed the TUSC local elections policy platform.

In Leicester, there were also four candidates of the Unity for Peace and Socialism party, and a mayoral candidate, who stood on a common platform with the TUSC candidates in the city. Their votes are also recorded here.

Thirteen candidates polled over 10%. Over a quarter polled more than 5%. The total vote for the 173 candidates listed was 25,523.

Here is a league table of TUSC results ordered by percentage of total votes. For results listed by region, see link at the bottom of this page.

For a note on the statistical method used in calculating vote percentages and for other notes go to:
http://www.tusc.org.uk/bulletin13.php

LOCAL AUTHORITY

WARD NAME

VOTE

Preston

Town Centre

840 (39.8%)

Walsall

Blakenall

928 (34%)

Coventry

St Michaels

1,263 (30.3%)

Bolsover

Shirebrook North West

172 (28.2%)

Rugby

Leam Valley

157 (16.2%)

Salford

Ordsall

381 (16.1%)

Kirklees

Crossland Moor & Netherton

866 (14.8%)

Sheffield

Burngreave

831 (14%)

Rugby

Brownsover South

122 (12.1%)

Cambridge

Romsey

356 (12%)

Stroud Town

Valley

228 (11.3%)

Bolsover

Bolsover West

174 (10.3%)

North Devon

Forches & Whiddon Valley

154 (10.1%)

North Devon

Yeo Valley

186 (9.6%)

Wakefield

Wakefield East

355 (9%)

Gateshead

Deckham

189 (7.9%)

Doncaster

Central

268 (7.8%)

Gateshead

High Fell

165 (7.5%)

Shepway

Cheriton

389 (7.4%)

Walsall

Bloxwich West

234 (7.4%)

Aylesbury

Walton Court & Hawkslade

183 (7.2%)

Carlisle

Upperby

93 (7.2%)

Carlisle

Currock

104 (7.1%)

Carlisle

Castle

90 (6.9%)

Mansfield

Yeoman Hill

61 (6.9%)

Gloucester

Barton & Tredworth

190 (6.8%)

Shepway

Morehall

172 (6.8%)

Shepway

Folkestone Harbour

142 (6.8%)

Coventry

Lower Stoke

291 (6.4%)

Portsmouth

Central Southsea

234 (6.2%)

Southampton

Bitterne Park

264 (6.1%)

Southampton

Redbridge

212 (6.1%)

Sefton

Netherton & Orrell

181 (6.1%)

Portsmouth

Fratton

177 (6%)

Barnsley

Central

150 (5.9%)

Rugby

Hillmorton

117 (5.8%)

Walsall

Birchills-Leamore

158 (5.5%)

Rugby

Bilton

122 (5.5%)

Lincoln

Abbey

120 (5.5%)

East Herts

St Mary’s

170 (5.4%)

Knowsley

Halewood

95 (5.4%)

Stoke-on-Trent

Meir North

66 (5.4%)

Stroud District

Uplands

45 (5.4%)

Leicester City

Braunstone Park & Rowley Fields

440 (5.3%)

Rotherham

Boston Castle

211 (5.1%)

Southampton

Bargate

158 (5.1%)

Southampton

Woolston

163 (4.8%)

Southampton

Bitterne

163 (4.8%)

Stoke-on-Trent

Hanley Park & Shelton

53 (4.8%)

Liverpool

Kirkdale

162 (4.7%)

Dover

Buckland

197 (4.6%)

Stevenage

Shephall

75 (4.6%)

Leicester City

Evington

347 (4.5%)

Leicester City

Coleman

351 (4.3%)

Rugby

Caldecott

85 (4.3%)

Northampton

Sunnyside

56 (4.3%)

Walsall

Bloxwich East

107 (4.1%)

Salford

Langworthy

98 (4.1%)

Stoke-on-Trent

Birches Head & Central Forest Park

175 (4%)

Walsall

Pleck

166 (4%)

Worcester

St Johns

88 (4%)

Salford

Winton

103 (3.9%)

Carlisle

Denton Holme

60 (3.8%)

Northampton

Kingsley

58 (3.8%)

Southampton

Sholing

157 (3.7%)

Stoke-on-Trent

Abbey Hulton & Townsend

127 (3.6%)

Gloucester

Barnwood

115 (3.6%)

Manchester

Ardwick

100 (3.6%)

Lincoln

Park

55 (3.5%)

Bristol

Windmill Hill

143 (3.4%)

Southampton

Swaythling

104 (3.4%)

Worcester

Bedwardine

99 (3.4%)

Bristol

Eastville

122 (3.3%)

Liverpool

Princes Park

104 (3.3%)

Rugby

Dunchurch & Knightlow

88 (3.3%)

Stevenage

Roebuck

61 (3.3%)

Stoke-on-Trent

Burslem Central

31 (3.3%)

Coventry

Cheylesmore

161 (3.1%)

Kirklees

Newsome

150 (3.1%)

Rugby

Eastlands

67 (3.1%)

Stevenage

Longmeadow

62 (3.1%)

Stevenage

Bandley Hill

61 (3.1%)

North East Lincs

West Marsh

38 (3.1%)

Sheffield

Gleadless Valley

186 (3%)

Bristol

Bedminster

125 (3%)

Bristol

St George East

105 (3%)

Bristol

Hillfields

104 (3%)

Lincoln

Glebe

58 (3%)

Southampton

Shirley

124 (2.9%)

Manchester

Baguley

74 (2.8%)

Stevenage

Bedwell

53 (2.8%)

Southampton

Harefield

117 (2.7%)

Lincoln

Castle

59 (2.7%)

Brighton

Hollingdean & Stanmer

335 (2.6%)

Coventry

Henley

113 (2.6%)

Southwark

The Lane

107 (2.6%)

Manchester

Fallowfield

83 (2.6%)

Coventry

Wyken

121 (2.5%)

Coventry

Sherbourne

117 (2.5%)

Liverpool

Riverside

88 (2.5%)

Liverpool

County

78 (2.5%)

Southampton

Bassett

110 (2.4%)

Coventry

Longford

101 (2.4%)

Bristol

St George West

78 (2.4%)

Manchester

Sharston

70 (2.4%)

Lincoln

Carholme

62 (2.4%)

Lincoln

Minster

57 (2.4%)

York

Heworth

219 (2.3%)

Sheffield

Graves Park

147 (2.3%)

Coventry

Radford

94 (2.3%)

Leeds

Headingley

88 (2.3%)

Stoke-on-Trent

Dresden & Florence

34 (2.3%)

Coventry

Earlsdon

136 (2.2%)

Coventry

Upper Stoke

95 (2.2%)

Southampton

Portswood

88 (2.2%)

Bristol

Cabot

85 (2.2%)

Bristol

Knowle

80 (2.2%)

Walsall

Brownhills

72 (2.2%)

Leicester City

Castle

232 (2.1%)

Medway

Gillingham South

206 (2.1%)

Leeds

Horsforth

164 (2.1%)

Coventry

Whoberley

109 (2.1%)

Southampton

Freemantle

89 (2.1%)

Walsall

Pelsall

77 (2.1%)

Southampton

Bevois

74 (2.1%)

Leicester City

Stoneygate

366 (2%)

Brighton

Moulsecoomb & Bevendean

267 (2%)

Coventry

Westwood

95 (2%)

Plymouth

Sutton & Mount Gould

75 (2%)

Leicester City

Westcotes

71 (2%)

Leicester City

Rushey Mead

272 (1.9%)

Medway

Rochester South & Horsted

214 (1.9%)

Medway

Luton & Wayfield

160 (1.9%)

Kirklees

Almondury

105 (1.9%)

Coventry

Binley & Willenhall

79 (1.9%)

Bristol

Frome Vale

70 (1.9%)

Nuneaton

Barpool

38 (1.9%)

Medway

Strood North

212 (1.8%)

Lewes

Priory

157 (1.8%)

Liverpool

Old Swan

74 (1.8%)

Bristol

Lawrence Hill

70 (1.8%)

Liverpool

Yew Tree

66 (1.8%)

Lincoln

Moorland

37 (1.8%)

Hull

Beverley

52 (1.7%)

Nottingham

Bulwell Forest

212 (1.6%)

Sheffield

Walkley

102 (1.6%)

Coventry

Foleshill

77 (1.6%)

Bristol

Filwood

35 (1.6%)

Lincoln

Boultham

31 (1.4%)

Coventry

Holbrook

57 (1.3%)

Coventry

Wainbody

83 (1.5%)

Walsall

Bentley & Darlaston North

43 (1.5%)

Bristol

Cotham

57 (1.4%)

Bristol

Clifton East

47 (1.4%)

Kirklees

Golcar

59 (1.1%)

Exeter

Whipton Barton

26 (1.1%)

Brighton

Hanover & Elm Grove

156 (1%)

Brighton

East Brighton

142 (1%)

Bristol

Brislington East

36 (1%)

Bristol

Brislington West

36 (1%)

Leicester City

Knighton

156 (0.9%)

Medway

Gillingham North

96 (0.9%)

Coventry

Bablake

45 (0.8%)

Coventry

Woodlands

44 (0.8%)

Bristol

Clifton

33 (0.8%)

May 2011 TUSC election results as a pdf
TUSC May 2011 election results as a Word file
TUSC May 2011 election results by region as a word file

See also the Socialist Party's analysis of the May 2011 local election results: Government Con-Demned at ballot box

Donate to the Socialist Party

Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

Inevitably, during the crisis we have not been able to sell the Socialist and raise funds in the ways we normally would.

We therefore urgently appeal to all our viewers to click here to donate to our Fighting Fund.

Please donate here.

All payments are made through a secure server.

My donation £

 

Your message: 

 






Related links:

TUSC:

triangleTUSC is back

triangleScotland: Pro-independence majority in highly polarised election

triangleWelsh Labour holds on to government but new crises loom

triangleHartlepool sums up Labour crisis

triangleThe Socialist Inbox

Election:

triangleSocialist Party national meeting: Perspectives for socialism after the elections

triangleRight-wing Partido Popular wins Madrid elections - a warning to the working class

triangleRMT: Militant industrial and political strategy must be fought for

trianglePost-election meetings

Socialist:

triangleStop Israeli state brutality

triangleObituary - Jon Elvin

triangleEaling parking wardens strike against Serco over absence policy

Elections:

triangleLeeds Socialist Party: The May elections - and the need for a new mass workers' party

triangleHackney & Islington Socialist Party: What now after the elections?

Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition:

triangleBellway must pay! Make our homes safe!

Article dated 7 May 2011

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

MEMBER RESOURCES

Pay in Fighting Fund

Pay in paper and book sales

Leaflets

Bulk book orders

New member submission

WHAT'S ON

triangle15 May Birmingham Socialist Party: How can we fight for socialist change and a new workers' party?

triangle17 May Oxfordshire & Aylesbury Socialist Party: The role of the state

triangle18 May Bristol North Socialist Party: Liverpool - history of socialist struggle

More...


The Socialist, weekly newspaper of the Socialist Party

Election analysis

Ireland

International news

Workplace news

Readers' opinion

Obituary

Subscribespacer|spacerebook / Kindlespacer|spacerPDF versionspacer|spacerText / Printspacer|spacer1133 onlinespacer|spacerBack issuesspacer|spacer Audio files


TUSC 2021 election video

More videos ...

What We Stand For
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Platform setting: =

Desktop version