Political instability and crisis but also new opportunities ahead
Chris Thomas, Controcorrente (CWI, Italy)
The “Tsunami tour” was the name comedian Beppe Grillo gave to his election meetings which filled piazzas throughout Italy with tens of thousands of ‘spectators’.
Now an electoral tsunami has well and truly rocked the Italian political system with Grillo’s Five Star Movement, which did not exist at the last election, becoming the biggest single party in the lower house with more than 25% of the vote. Another 25% of the electorate stayed at home, the highest ever post-war abstention rate.
The outcome of the 24-25 February election is political gridlock, with no party or list having an overall majority and the possibility of fresh elections quite soon. The opinion polls had predicted a victory for the Democratic Party (PD) in the lower house and most commentators expected an alliance of the PD in the senate with the electoral coalition of the outgoing (unelected) prime minister, Mario Monti.
However, the polls vastly underestimated support for the Five Star Movement and also for ex-prime minister Silvio Berlusconi’s PDL, which, on the basis of populist programmes, tapped into deep and widespread anti-austerity and anti-political establishment feelings.
Just 120,000 votes separated the PD camp from that of the PDL in the lower house (Camera). The centre-left got 29.5% to the centre-right’s 29.2% but the PD lost nearly four million votes compared with the last election and the PDL six million!
Even though the PD, as the ‘winning’ party, will receive bonus seats to give it a majority in the Camera, it cannot reach a majority in both houses of parliament, even in alliance with Monti.
Grillo has ruled out any alliances. A ‘grand coalition’ – embracing Bersani (PD leader) and Berlusconi – although not impossible, could be politically suicidal for the PD.
The ‘technocratic government’ card has already been played with the Monti government, so the most likely perspective now seems to be a period of political crisis leading eventually to another election, possibly after a change in the electoral law, in which the support for the ‘Grillinis’ could grow even further.
The “worst result possible” was how the Wall Street Journal described the election outcome. The repercussions will reverberate far beyond Italy.
The day after the election, falls on the Milan stock exchange were so great that trading was temporarily suspended. At the same time the spread (difference between interest rates on Italian and German bonds) began to increase, raising once again the prospect of market turmoil in Europe. The fate of the euro could eventually be decided not in Greece but in Italy.
No to austerity
The election results were an overwhelming rejection of Monti’s austerity policies of public spending cuts, tax increases and attacks on workers’ rights. Monti had been dubbed the ‘saviour of Italy’ when he replaced Berlusconi in November 2011 and the markets began to stabilise after months of instability and crisis.
In these elections he was the candidate of Brussels, of Merkel (German chancellor) and of a section of the Italian capitalist class. However, Monti’s alliance received only 10.5% in the Camera.
Grillo and the Five Star Movement were the real winners. His slogan “tutti a casa” (send them all packing) summed up the absolute disgust and contempt which ordinary Italians have for politicians, establishment parties and an entire rotten political system mired in corruption, scandals and self-enrichment while working people are called on to make more and more sacrifices.
Reports of the huge cover up and fraud at Italy’s third biggest bank, Monti dei Paschi, exploded during the election campaign, tainting the PD, who have been historically closely linked with the management of the bank.
It reinforced the deep-rooted feeling that the whole system stinks. Every day pages of the press were devoted to stories of politicians receiving kickbacks for economic favours, of public funds being creamed off to fund lavish lifestyles and of company directors (including the director of one of Italy’s biggest and most prestigious companies, Finmeccanica) being arrested for fraud and corruption.
The Grillo votes came from across the political spectrum. In the piazzas, Grillo shouted populist slogans and sound-bites about curbing the power and privileges of the political ‘caste’, about a ‘citizen’s income’, a referendum on the euro, a shorter working week, nationalising the banks, and about improving the environment, all of which struck a chord with those who have had enough of cuts and corruption.
There are enormous illusions in the ability of the Grillinis to shake the system up. In reality, the Movement (Grillo refuses to call it a party) has no worked-out programme capable of solving the day-to-day problems of unemployment, low wages, and declining public services which most ordinary Italians are concerned with.
It has no real roots in the workplaces or communities, organising principally via the internet and social media. Grillo himself decides policies and tactics in an ad hoc, off-the-cuff way with no explanation or understanding of how those policies could actually be implemented in practice. His ‘rants’ are confused and inconsistent.
Grillo has an ambiguous position with regards to the far right and immigration. During the campaign he spoke of “eliminating” trade unions although he has also made a distinction between CGIL, CISL and UIL (trade union centres) on the one hand and the more combative FIOM and ‘unions of the base’.
At a certain stage the limitations and contradictions of the Movement will become clear, ripping it apart. It is likely to disappear as quickly as it has arisen; but for the moment, in the absence of a left-wing, anti-capitalist alternative, it has become the main vehicle for expressing the anger, frustration and disaffection of millions of Italians and its support could grow even more.
These elections took place against the background of the longest recession in Italy in the post-war period. GDP (economic output) has declined 7% since the economic crisis began. Unemployment has doubled and more than 37% of young people are now without work. Devastated by rising taxes and declining wages, the average family’s real income is at the same level as it was 27 years ago.
Yet with working and middle class people desperate for an end to austerity, the PD was offering a continuation of the Monti agenda with just a few ‘modifications’.
They pledged to respect the fiscal compact and balance the budget even though this would entail cuts of €45 billion every year. This is behind the massive fall of 11% in their ratings towards the end of the campaign.
Berlusconi, on the other hand, was astute enough to understand how supporting Monti’s tax increases and cuts agenda was undermining his electoral base and so he pulled the plug on the Monti government, waging a populist anti-austerity, anti-Europe, pro-tax-cutting election campaign.
This included sending a mock-up tax demand to every home pledging to reimburse every penny that people had paid out when Monti reintroduced the IMU household tax.
On the basis of this campaign the ‘mummy’, as one French newspaper dubbed Berlusconi, rose like Lazarus from the dead; his PDL alliance clawed back 15 points in support and ended up neck and neck with the PD.
What little remains of the left was electorally crushed. Nichi Vendola’s SEL (Left Ecology Freedom) party, allied with the PD, got just 3.2%. Had the party stood alone it would have failed to cross the 4% threshold and would have had no seats in parliament. This was ultimately the fate of Rivoluzione Civile, the heterogeneous electoral list headed by the former magistrate, Antonio Ingroia.
New force needed
Instead of standing on a clear anti-capitalist/workers’ list, Rifondazione Comunista (PRC), once a semi-mass workers’ party, dissolved itself into Rivoluzione Civile on a vague reformist/liberal platform.
This was an opportunist move, undemocratically imposed from above in a desperate attempt to get back into parliament. The PRC lost all of their MPs five years ago after entering into a coalition government with the pro-capitalist PD.
After every electoral defeat, the PRC leadership, rather than looking to increase its support by involving itself in struggles in the workplaces and in local communities, has sought a new unprincipled electoral alliance, and every time its vote has plummeted. Rivoluzione Civile won just 2.2% of the vote meaning no seats at all.
The unprecedented support for Beppe Grillo can only be understood in the tragic context of the collapse of the Italian left. But now an entirely new political landscape is emerging.
The anger of working class people has exploded in the ballot box rather than on the streets and in the workplaces, but continuing crisis and instability will see the development of new mass struggles.
At a certain stage the inadequacy of the Five Star Movement will be exposed leaving millions looking for another alternative. This will open up huge possibilities for the building of a new mass political force based, not on confused populism, but on the movements of workers and young people.
It could offer a real solution to the problems of working people by challenging not only the politicians but the economic roots of the whole rotten capitalist system.