Wide screen devices may view this page better by clicking here

Housing :: Canal

spotCampaigns

spotOrganisations

spotArguments for socialism

spotPeople

spotInternational

spotEvents

spotAround the UK


All keywords


All Campaigns subcategories:

Anti-capitalism

Anti-fascist

Anti-racism

Anti-war

Asylum

Black and Asian

Children

CNWP

Corporate crime

Disability

Education

Election campaigns

Environment

EU

Finance

Food

Gender Recognition Act

Health and safety

Health and welfare

* Housing

Human Rights

LGBT Pride

Local government

Local services

Low pay

Migration

Nationalisation

New workers party

NHS

Pensions

Post Office

Poverty

Privatisation

Public Services

Socialism

Socialist

Sport

Stop the slaughter of Tamils

Students

The state

Transport

TUSC

Welfare rights

Women

Workplace and TU campaigns

Youth


Canal


29 August 2017

Search site for keywords: Boaters - Canal - River - Waterways - Government - Travel - Homes

Moving a narrowboat

Moving a narrowboat   (Click to enlarge)

Liveaboard boaters being forced off the waterways

Ellen Kenyon Peers

The Inland Waterways Association (IWA) last year renewed its suggestion for a 1,500% increase in miles that continuous cruisers (people without a home mooring) would be expected to travel in order to be able to renew their waterways licence. There are over 35,000 licensed boats on the canals and rivers - more than at the peak of canal use during the industrial revolution - and over 5,000 of these are without a home mooring.

Although the law simply states that boats without a mooring must be 'genuinely navigating', the enforcement agency, the Canal and River Trust (CRT), has imposed distances of 15-20 miles to be covered over the duration of a 6 or 12 month licence (although it is believed that the last month of cruising does not contribute to this total). The IWA would like this figure to increase to 300 miles, despite there being no legal basis for this.

The UK-wide housing crisis has led to an increase in the number of boats on the canals as more and more people turn to life on the water as an alternative to astronomically high private rents and the huge deposits now required to get a mortgage agreement. However, this has resulted in increasing pressure being put on facilities for boaters.

Bizarrely, among the measures taken by the CRT to deal with this has been the removal of already over-burdened resources previously available to boaters - including removing 40% of litter bins in a bid to 'decrease' rubbish left on the towpath. This backwards logic is typical of the CRT, a charity which pays its head, Richard Parry, 188,600 a year, while mooring rangers and lock keepers are increasingly advertised as 'volunteer' positions.

Government cuts

The overall upkeep of the waterways has faced cuts year after year. When managed by the publically owned British Waterways (BW), the annual grant given to BW by the government reached 76.6 million in 2003-04. This was reduced to 58.9 million by 2010-11, the year prior to privatisation - the 2012 handing over to the CRT.

The last accounts of the CRT show a government grant now down to 49.6 million. The CRT supplements the grant by collecting hundreds of pounds a year from every licence fee payer, in addition to receiving donations from benefactors and members of the public, plus property and investment income.

The National Bargee Travellers Association (NBTA), which represents itinerant liveaboard boaters, has already rejected proposals by the CRT to increase licence fees and has stated that the CRT's recent report on the issue was "shambolic" as it "unfairly blames boaters without home moorings for congestion". It is clear that both the CRT and the IWA would like the waterways to be reserved for 'leisure boaters' who holiday on the canal, rather than people whose boat is their permanent home - many of whom live in poverty as statistics show.

Liveaboards include key workers such as teachers and nurses who have been forced out of 'traditional' homes on land due to low wages. It is clear that expecting these people to travel ever greater distances every year outside their home area would impact badly on public services. It is also very damaging for liveaboard children who need to be near their school and community.

If continuous cruisers don't move often enough and far enough, they firstly have their licence period restricted (with a higher monthly licence cost a consequence of this) and ultimately they face having their boat confiscated.

'Get a home mooring' is the advice of the CRT to people who need or want to stay in one area, but in parts of the country like London, or on the Kennet and Avon canal near Bristol, there are no affordable long-term moorings available.

It is obvious that boating organisations like the IWA and CRT are attempting to force boaters off the waterways who cannot afford - or even find - long-term moorings. There is also an arrogant and dismissive attitude shown towards liveaboards for daring to live in a way that is viewed in establishment circles as harming capitalism's notions of civility and society.

Donate to the Socialist Party

Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

Inevitably, during the crisis we have not been able to sell the Socialist and raise funds in the ways we normally would.

We therefore urgently appeal to all our viewers to click here to donate to our Fighting Fund.

Please donate here.

All payments are made through a secure server.

My donation

 

Your message: 

 






Housing keywords:

Accommodation (103)

Bedroom tax (189)

Butterfields (29)

Canal (1)

Grenfell Tower (58)

Homeless (106)

Homelessness (115)

Homes (283)

Households (67)

Housing (899)

Housing benefit (102)

Rents (138)

Repossessions (7)

Squatting (3)

Tenants (207)

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Article dated 29 August 2017

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party

MEMBER RESOURCES

Pay in Fighting Fund

Pay in paper and book sales

Leaflets

Bulk book orders

New member submission

WHAT'S ON

triangle14 Apr Hackney & Islington Socialist Party: Lessons of the 1921 Poplar councillors' struggle

triangle14 Apr Tyneside Socialist Party: Our TUSC against cuts electoral challenge

triangle15 Apr Sheffield Socialist Party: When Liverpool beat Thatcher

More...


The Socialist, weekly newspaper of the Socialist Party

Covid-19

News

Elections

Workplace news

Lessons from history

Campaigns news

Readers' opinion

Subscribespacer|spacerebook / Kindlespacer|spacerPDF versionspacer|spacerText / Printspacer|spacer1129 onlinespacer|spacerBack issuesspacer|spacer Audio files


Thurrock council workers striking against pay cuts, photo by Dave Murray

Thurrock council workers striking against pay cuts, photo Dave Murray

What We Stand For
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Platform setting: =

Desktop version