Renationalisation of the Probation Service: A step in the right direction

Strikes against the earlier privatisaiton of probation, photo Paul Mattsson

Strikes against the earlier privatisaiton of probation, photo Paul Mattsson   (Click to enlarge: opens in new window)

Probation service worker

My employer, one of the twenty-one private ‘community rehabilitation companies’ (CRCs) providing probation services to low and medium-risk offenders across England and Wales, claimed to be “surprised and disappointed” at the recent announcement that all probation services would be brought back under the publicly owned national probation service (NPS).

Partial renationalisation was proposed last year. This would have seen the supervision of all cases brought back under the management of the NPS, with some involvement of private companies in the provision of unpaid work and accredited programmes. However, the Ministry of Justice’s latest announcement means that these will now also be brought back within the remit of the NPS.

In 2014, Tory secretary of state for justice Chris Grayling’s disastrous probation reforms resulted in the privatisation of 70% of the probation service, leaving the remaining 30% of cases – those deemed to be higher-risk – to be dealt with by the NPS. The government claims that the decision to reverse this was prompted by the coronavirus crisis; that the pandemic highlighted the difficulties in coordinating the effective supervision of all offenders during lockdown.

The reality, however, is that the CRCs have been failing from the start. A 2017 report found that, while the NPS was protecting the public effectively, the CRC’s were failing to properly assess offender’s risks in half the cases. Consequently, rates of reoffending have risen significantly. Privatisation poses a very real threat to public safety.

Difficulties

Offenders have also suffered. As a community payback supervisor, I work with offenders daily. Many have complained to me about difficulties getting in touch with their probation officer, often having to leave dozens of messages and send numerous emails before getting a response. This has limited their ability to enrol in educational or training courses, and meetings with probation officers have been reduced to little more than a 10-minute ‘check-in’.

Probation officers are incredibly hardworking and committed, but they have reported being overworked, under enormous amounts of pressure, working in an environment which is confusing, chaotic and unprofessional. This is the reality of private provision of a public service, whereby the priority to make profit and meet targets conflicts with the needs of its users.

It is therefore clear that the renationalisation of our probation service is a victory. It is, however, just one small step in the right direction in the fight to end privatisation. At the same time the Ministry of Justice published its proposals for probation reforms, the Tories announced that companies were being invited to bid for contracts for the building and management of a new private prison in Wellingborough.

So, while one aspect of our criminal justice system is being renationalised, another is becoming increasingly privatised.

The Socialist Party is committed to fighting to defend public institutions from destructive privatisation. All of our public services should be fully funded, fully publicly owned, and under democratic working-class control.