Wide screen devices may view this page better by clicking here

Trade Union :: Telecoms



spotArguments for socialism




spotAround the UK

All keywords

All Organisations subcategories:



Committee for a Workers International


Labour Party

Left and radical


Nationalist and National Liberation

Pro capitalist and Imperialist


Social Networks

Socialist Party


* Trade Union


Voluntary & non-profit


19 August 2014

Search site for keywords: Telecoms - Strike - CWU - BT - Performance

BT CWU members vote for strike action in latest consultation

By a CWU Telecoms member

At the last CWU conference, a debate saw delegates, based on their branch experiences and caseload, conclude that the national agreements in place on Performance Management were not working and that the process was still punitive, with managers not being reined in.
They opposed the Telecoms Executive who wanted the agreements to be given more time to work and demanded a strike ballot on the issue.

This came after the CWU had come within 'a whisker' of an industrial action ballot two times in the last three years. Delegates' patience, reflecting pressure from members and lay officers, had finally run out.

A motion demanded that if members did not see improvements by July, a move to ballot for industrial action would commence. The Executive responded by mailing out a "consultation" survey to all affected members across all BT groups. They asked three questions.

The mail-out was very much an appeal to give the Executive more time. Not dissimilar to material from BT HR and Employee Relations at work, members were implored to read the material and make a "very important" decision. Both the CWU and BT management were desperately hoping that members would 'see sense' as they implored yet more 'partnership'.

Based on their experiences, 80% of members had, for question 1, seen no improvement since the last survey in 2013. Then it had been that 93% had seen no improvement. So in one year, things had only improved for 13% - evidence, if any were needed, that the agreements have delivered little if any change on the shop floor.

Question 2 saw 61% of members wanting to give the existing agreements more time to improve the culture in BT.

Question 3, the big one, saw 57% desire a ballot for industrial action now.

The turnout was 28%.

Desire for action

Question 3, amongst those returning papers, saw the highest number of responses for and against than each of the other two. This showed that this question was, in members' minds, the most immediate and important one to them.

That 72% of members didn't return papers shows that rather than not concerned, they are tired of being surveyed, tired of working in an environment where nothing seems to change for the better. They didn't see the CWU as being serious enough to warrant their attention.

Given the woeful absence and outright unwillingness to embark on any serious campaigning nationally against Performance Management over the years by the union, it is a testimony to members' determination to fight that 57% who voted still demanded a ballot for action. It also vindicates the conference decision of branch delegates to oppose the Executive's position.

A sober analysis of the results shows that the picture is not contradictory at all. CWU members in BT want a successful industrial action ballot result that can be used in negotiations to get the boot off their throats. If BT refuses then members want to walk, to force the company's hand if necessary. This is the only action ultimately that BT understands and members know it.

Failings of Telecoms union leaders

Branch officers and reps have burgeoning casework files, a testimony to the successive failure of the CWU Telecoms Executive to defend members from the Performance Management regime.

In the branches there is a growing consensus that the CWU in BT, at a national level, is no more than a glorified Staff Association. A feeling driven no less where local branches have a good record of representing members in disciplinary meetings.

It is not uncommon now for overburdened branch officers to visit Head Office and come away wondering how clear the desks look there when compared to theirs back home.

BT senior managers have made the mistake of thinking that the people they see at negotiations actually reflect the workplace. This consultation ballot result is a wake-up call to both parties that both the employer's and CWU Executive's joint initiative to dissuade members from Industrial action has failed.

Confident campaign needed

The Executive should now be pressed by branches to initiate the industrial action ballot. With a confident campaign, the 72% who did not participate this time could be swung round. A successful vote for action could then be used in negotiations.

Branches need to convene members' meetings and initiate a campaign to oppose any further Executive inaction. Such a campaign is essential and the need immediate.

The mood is such in some workplaces that local management could spark unofficial action which could rapidly spread nationally, such is the discontent in some places.
However, this mood may not be universal, for example in some smaller or isolated workplaces where local managers may have been more pragmatic in implementing Performance Management.

Unofficial action always carries the risk that workers are left open to victimisation by a vicious national management and compliant CWU Executive once the action ceases.

At base is the future of the CWU in BT. If the union can't deliver on this issue then members will increasingly feel that maintaining membership is no longer worthwhile.

The union has to be reclaimed for members as part and parcel of the campaign to get the Executive to ballot for industrial action.

The CWU Executive now proposes more meetings with BT and yet another survey, this time alongside Prospect, the managers' union. This is not what members want, and it is not what conference voted for. It doesn't even fit in with the needs of Prospect members! Both CWU and Prospect members want action, want the boot taken off the throat, not death by survey.

The CWU Executive must initiate the ballot for industrial action over Performance Management now!

Appendix - Vote breakdown

Q1. 11,086 members answered the question. 2,205 (20%) said yes, 8,881 (80%) said no.

Q2. 11,149 members answered the question. 6,788 (61%) said yes, 4,361 (39%) said no.

Q3. 11,242 members answered the question. 6,374 (57%) said yes, 4,868 (39%) said no.

Donate to the Socialist Party

Finance appeal

The coronavirus crisis has laid bare the class character of society in numerous ways. It is making clear to many that it is the working class that keeps society running, not the CEOs of major corporations.

The results of austerity have been graphically demonstrated as public services strain to cope with the crisis.

The government has now ripped up its 'austerity' mantra and turned to policies that not long ago were denounced as socialist. But after the corona crisis, it will try to make the working class pay for it, by trying to claw back what has been given.

Inevitably, during the crisis we have not been able to sell the Socialist and raise funds in the ways we normally would.

We therefore urgently appeal to all our viewers to click here to donate to our Fighting Fund.

Please donate here.

All payments are made through a secure server.

My donation


Your message: 


Trade Union keywords:

BFAWU (124)

BMA (49)

Bectu (21)

CPSA (7)

CWU (374)

EIS (5)

Equity (18)

IWGB (25)

IWW (2)

NEU (73)

NSSN (407)

NSSN (407)

NUM (2)

Napo (29)

National Education Union (95)

National Shop Stewards Network (454)

New Education Union (1)

Nipsa (9)

PCS (982)

Society of Radiographers (1)

TUC (439)


Telecoms (18)

Union (1907)

WSSN (1)

Wales Shop Stewards Network (1)

Wales TUC (7)

Zhanartu (1)

Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Article dated 19 August 2014

Join the Socialist Party
Subscribe to Socialist Party publications
Donate to the Socialist Party


Pay in Fighting Fund

Pay in paper and book sales


Bulk book orders

New member submission


triangle13 May Socialist Party Scotland: What is socialism and why should you fight for it

triangle13 May Waltham Forest Socialist Party: What next in the fight against Covid austerity?

triangle13 May Sheffield Socialist Party: Onward from the elections - continue the fight for socialism


The Socialist, weekly newspaper of the Socialist Party

Election analysis


International news

Workplace news

Readers' opinion


Subscribespacer|spacerebook / Kindlespacer|spacerPDF versionspacer|spacerText / Printspacer|spacer1133 onlinespacer|spacerBack issuesspacer|spacer Audio files

TUSC 2021 election video

More videos ...

What We Stand For
Socialist Party Facebook page
Socialist Party on Twitter
Visit us on Youtube

Platform setting: =

Desktop version