Wide screen devices may view this page better by clicking here
Women :: Dress
All Campaigns subcategories:
Send your news, views and criticism in not more than 150 words to Socialist Postbox, PO Box 24697, London E11 1YD, phone 020 8988 8771 or email [email protected]
We reserve the right to shorten and edit letters. Don't forget to give your name, address and phone number. Confidentiality will be respected if requested.
Views of letter writers do not necessarily match those of the Socialist Party.
Recently, the two major trade unions representing education workers reaffirmed their opposition to Prevent, which requires teachers to spy on and report young people at risk of "radicalisation".
At the University and College Union (UCU) annual conference in June, a motion titled "Prevent - education is not surveillance" was unanimously backed, which, among other things, resolved for the union "to work with students and others in opposing the Prevent agenda."
Similarly, a few months earlier, at the annual conference of the National Union of Teachers (NUT) held in March, a motion was passed calling for Prevent to be withdrawn and replaced with new guidance for schools.
But it is not just trade unions who have been vocal in their calls for the termination of Prevent.
In 2014, the Economist observed that Arun Kundnani's excellent book 'The Muslims are coming!' had "some fair points to make about the counter-productivity" of Prevent. "His analysis of Prevent rang true".
Professor Kundnani's fair criticisms of the government's counterproductive terror policies were then updated in his 2015 report, 'A decade lost: rethinking radicalisation and extremism,' which reaffirmed that "the government should end its Prevent policy." He continued: "This will help to avoid nurturing a new generation of antagonised and disenfranchised citizens. Ultimately, Prevent-style policies make Britain less safe."
Professor Kundnani's criticisms of Prevent are not unique in this regard.
In April this year, Maina Kiai, the UN special rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly, made his own position very clear. "It appears that Prevent is having the opposite of its intended effect: by dividing, stigmatising and alienating segments of the population, Prevent could end up promoting extremism, rather than countering it."
I have attached an extract from an article by John Pilger. Its main virtue is that, while brief, it illustrates the different political characters of Pilger and Owen Jones.
"Described by the Guardian columnist Owen Jones as 'funny, charming, with a coolness that eludes practically every other politician', Obama the other day sent drones to slaughter 150 people in Somalia. He kills people usually on Tuesdays, according to the New York Times, when he is handed a list of candidates for death by drone. So cool."
A 'couture' dress sold for £100,000 pounds caused one Murdoch newspaper to sigh: "One dress would cost more than a year's fees at Eton. For some people this kind of life is normal"!
1967 Abortion Act (9)
Beauty industry (1)
Domestic violence (93)
Equal pay (45)
International Womens day (8)
Lone parents (5)
Muslim women (7)
Right to choose (35)
Sexual harassment (22)
Socialist women (14)
Violence against women (43)
womens rights (1)
Article dated 19 October 2016
The Socialist, weekly newspaper of the Socialist Party
Platform setting: =